ISLAMABAD: The Capital Development Authority (CDA) on Tuesday rejected claims that a World War I memorial had been demolished, stating that the structure is being carefully relocated as part of a conservation effort to ensure its long-term preservation and public accessibility.
In a clarification, the CDA said the memorial was dismantled under established conservation protocols, with all original bricks and materials preserved to allow for accurate reconstruction at a new site. The authority stressed that the process constitutes preservation through relocation, not demolition.
According to the CDA, the monument had significantly deteriorated over time, and relocation was necessary to ensure dignified upkeep, enhanced protection, and sustainable maintenance. The memorial is being re-erected under CDA supervision at a safer and more prominent location near the Northern Bypass roundabout close to Rehara village, where it will be more visible and accessible to the public.
The authority clarified that while the monument does not appear on the Archaeology Department’s notified heritage inventory, the department was formally consulted, and all required procedures were followed. Additionally, legal heir consent was obtained, with the great-grandson of Subedar Ghulam Ali submitting a sworn affidavit and no-objection certificate prior to the relocation.
The CDA emphasised that the historical tribute remains fully intact and continues to honour Subedar Ghulam Ali’s gallantry during World War I, including his award of the Military Cross.
Terming allegations of demolition as “factually incorrect,” the authority noted that relocation of heritage structures due to development needs is an internationally recognised practice, citing examples such as the relocation of the Cape Hatteras Lighthouse in the United States, Marble Arch in London, and the reconstruction of London Bridge abroad.
The CDA also urged media organisations to verify facts before publication, warning that the circulation of sensational or misleading claims without due diligence constitutes irresponsible journalism and may be treated as deliberate misinformation.
