Abb Takk News
MOST POPULARNews TickerTop NewsTRENDINGWorld

China imposes $2.6 Billion tariffs on Canadian agricultural and food products

BEJING: On Saturday, China revealed it would impose tariffs on Canadian agricultural and food products valued at over $2.6 billion. This move serves as retaliation against tariffs that Canada imposed in October, marking a new chapter in a trade conflict largely influenced by U.S. President Donald Trump’s previous tariff threats.

The newly announced tariffs by the commerce ministry, set to take effect on March 20, align with the 100% and 25% import duties that Canada imposed on electric vehicles and steel and aluminum products imported from China just over four months ago.

By excluding canola, also referred to as rapeseed, from the list of tariffs, Beijing may be signaling a willingness to engage in trade discussions, particularly since canola was one of Canada’s leading exports to the world’s largest agricultural importer before China began investigating it for anti-dumping measures last year. However, analysts interpret the imposition of tariffs as a clear warning.

Trump administration has indicated the potential for reducing the 25% import duties currently proposed against Canada and Mexico, contingent upon their response to the additional 20% tariffs he has mandated on Chinese goods, which are primarily linked to fentanyl trade issues.

Canada’s recent trade actions have been criticized by China’s commerce ministry as serious violations of World Trade Organization (WTO) regulations. The ministry described these actions as a classic example of protectionism and discriminatory practices that significantly undermine China’s legitimate rights and interests.

In response, China plans to impose a 100% tariff on over $1 billion worth of Canadian rapeseed oil, oil cakes, and pea imports, along with a 25% duty on $1.6 billion in Canadian aquatic products and pork.

Dan Wang, the China director at Eurasia Group in Singapore, suggested that this aggressive move by China may serve as a warning. “By acting now, China is signaling to Canada the potential repercussions of aligning too closely with U.S. trade policies,” he stated.

“China’s delayed response (to Ottawa’s October tariffs) likely reflects both capacity constraints and strategic signalling,” she added. “The commerce ministry is stretched thin, juggling trade disputes with the U.S. and European Union.”
“Canada, a lower priority, had to wait its turn.”